"The New South" Memorial at Arlington National Cemetery is slated for destruction based upon the Naming Commission's decision to ignore...

The term Dixie pre-dates the Civil War so how could it now only represent the Confederacy? It can't and it doesn't!

The dedication speech by a Union Vet and Commander-in-Chief of the GAR proves The Naming Commission wrong again. Read his words.

The Naming Commission is afraid of any sign of reunion and reconciliation. All Americans should be concerned by their report.

The destruction of a priceless monument can only occur if the false information of The Naming Commission is believed. Learn the truth here.

The United States History Panels by Laura Gardin Fraser in 1965 may be one of the most remarkable pieces of art for any lover of American...

Every soldier's grave made during our unfortunate Civil War is a tribute to American valor. [Applause.] And while, when those graves were...

The Naming Commission on Page 11 of Part II must have a quote erased by Robert E. Lee, which has nothing to do with honoring him or...

The Naming Commission never determines voluntary service for Beauregard, like every other Confederate, and is hesitant to review the...

"Sir: If his Excellency, the President, has not accepted my resignation as a Captain in the Navy of the U. S., I respectfully ask to...

The Naming Commission's tactics are clear when they distort the ideas of Maury. His writings also challenge the idea of voluntary service.

Lee is under attack from all angles. Instead of clarifying for the public, the Commission adds to the pile. Can they get away with it?

Did any person on the Naming Commission fact check this claim? Maybe there is a reason they never listed the Colonels or cited a source!

The Naming Commission reports a lie about Lee's slaveholding. If we accept it, what would it mean for Lincoln and others?

Even when the Naming Commission may be right, their process and inconsistent standards are revealed.

It is questionable whether he owned slaves but a bigger question is if his service was voluntary with the CSA.

As a politician after the war, Gordon left behind many writings for the Commission to refute, yet they didn't even try!

The Naming Commission decides to attack the character & skill of Braxton Bragg to avoid discussing if his service was voluntary.

Benning's views are as irrelevant as the racist views of General Sherman: the question is his service. Was it voluntary?

The Naming Commission cannot rename assets for someone that served in the CSA involuntarily. So why won't they define what voluntary means?