Lee is under attack from all angles. Instead of clarifying for the public, the Commission adds to the pile. Can they get away with it?

Did any person on the Naming Commission fact check this claim? Maybe there is a reason they never listed the Colonels or cited a source!

The Naming Commission reports a lie about Lee's slaveholding. If we accept it, what would it mean for Lincoln and others?

Even when the Naming Commission may be right, their process and inconsistent standards are revealed.

It is questionable whether he owned slaves but a bigger question is if his service was voluntary with the CSA.

As a politician after the war, Gordon left behind many writings for the Commission to refute, yet they didn't even try!

The Naming Commission decides to attack the character & skill of Braxton Bragg to avoid discussing if his service was voluntary.

Benning's views are as irrelevant as the racist views of General Sherman: the question is his service. Was it voluntary?

The Naming Commission cannot rename assets for someone that served in the CSA involuntarily. So why won't they define what voluntary means?